I don’t really see movies when they come out at the cinema much anymore. I’d like to get back to that, in theory at least, but I’m lazy about going out and audiences sometimes annoy me these days. So, I tend to save my films up for when I can rent them online at home or when they come to streaming. I still watch them as if I were in a cinema, as much as possible anyway, but I don’t get to them as fast as you might.
That’s why,
when I get to talking about movies I’ve recently seen, I’m often talking about
stuff you’ll have seen six months or a year ago. Often, it’s even longer than that.
I don’t mind if you don’t. Hell, I don’t mind even if you do.
So, for today’s post, I just thought I’d type a bit about a couple of recent movies - my recent, not yours – and see where I get to.
So… what have I seen?
Well, last
night we watched ‘Challenger,’ which sounds like it should be a space shuttle
movie, but which is actually a tennis/love triangle movie. We came to this
because my younger son suggested we should see it and his recommendations are
always worth respecting. Strike that. Almost always. I didn’t like this one. I
think Sam put us on to it because my wife Patricia is a major (major) tennis
fan and a twice weekly club player, when she’s not injured (get well soon,
darlin’ x). The trouble with seeing a movie about a sport you love is that it
can be hyped and soundtracked as much as you want, the action will never quite convince.
This movie did pretty good in convincing us that the protagonists were really
good at tennis but, like I said, it never totally works when you’re super-familiar
with the real thing. What else? The characters were a bit dislikable, I
thought. The shifting timeline was interesting and the unusual equality of
camera interest in both the male and female form was commendable. Ther was an
awful lot of sweat in the final sequences and the Rocky-like levels of sporting
overdrive, coupled with the comically overblown conclusion made for an un-endearing
show overall. But, hey, the soundtrack was pumping and the people in it looked
good and it was smart and sexy. Just not for me, alas.
More for me
was ‘Poor Things.’ I had heard mixed reviews. But, really, what else would you
expect from a Yorgos Lanthimos film? I set aside a solitary Saturday afternoon
and enjoyed this one. A Frankenstein fable of a man who creates a daughter who
finds her way remarkably through the world. The cast have such fun with all
this and it’s grotesque and sumptuous is almost equal measure. People said that
Mark Ruffalo overplayed his role and that kind of annoys me. It’s as if they
think he turned up on set and said, “this is who I will be, take it or leave
it.” When, of course, the character will have evolved from the writing and the
direction, as well as the actor’s own feelings. I thought he was great. I
thought they all were. I didn’t think Trish would like this one, so I went solo
on it, but she caught up on it herself afterwards and apparently liked it a
lot. “I like weird,” she proclaimed and, of course, I should have known this.
I want to
see ‘Inside Out 2’. I really like the first one, particularly the script, which
balanced everything really well and wasn’t afraid to literally kill one of its
darlings. I’d nearly go and sit in an empty cinema to see this one but there
might well be kids there and that would be no good.
I am also girding
my loins to see ‘Zone of Interest’ which both my sons highly recommend, and
which Sam has gone as far as to say that it may be the best film he has ever
seen. Unusually for me, I find myself a bit afraid of it. I know it will be difficult
and I find I’m trying to build myself up to that. I will report back.
Things I
haven’t seen include Oppenheimer. I’m not afraid of it, like I am with Zone of
Interest but I find I need to find the right time to sit with it and I don’t
reckon it’s going to be a smooth sailing. I’ll get there. I always get there. Just
not yet (as the guy says in Gladiator). Not yet.
The other
movie that is firmly on my list is La Chimera. A good friend spoke so highly of
this that I recommended it to both my sons, John, and Sam, and they both saw it
(in separate countries), and both liked it a lot. It’s available for rental now
and I think it will be my next one.
What else?
I loved Anatomy of a Fall. The prosecutor was my favourite in it. You should
see it if you haven’t. It’s on Amazon Prime now, I think.
I rewatch
movies a lot. I learn things from doing that and I justify it that way. I watched
Jaws again, as I do at least once a year. There’s often something new to see. Last
time I thought that Hendricks behaviour after finding Chrissie’s remains on the
beach were a telling echo of John Wayne’s behaviour in The Searchers, after
finding Lucy’s body in the canyon. Both dig in the sand with their knife. I
love Jaws, always have. The shark may be rubbery, but the beauty of its fin as
it makes its way to the pond is pure cinema. I love The Searchers too. It has
the most inappropriate ‘U’ certificate I’ve ever seen.
There are
lots of films I haven’t seen but I’ll keep working my way through them. It’s
not work, really, that’s the wrong word.
It’s a labour
of love.
2 comments:
Yeah, films used to be a big thing. I have clear memories of going to the pictures as a kid but the last time I saw a film in a cinema was Star Trek Into Darkness and there were two of us in the entire place or it might just have been me; I think there were two of us when I watched one of the Pink Panther sequels. Not sure why Carrie wasn’t with me. Maybe she was in America at the time. But I remember seeing all the Planet of the Apes films and the Disney classics and my sister walking out of The Hitcher (the one and only time I never watched a film to the bitter end) and the silence as we filed out after seeing The Elephant Man (that was weird). Viewing at home is convenient and I have a huge—well, I think it’s huge—TV so the quality’s great not that I care much about HD or can even tell the difference. But it’s not the same. I doubt I will ever go back to the picture again.
Not seen most of the films you mentioned bar Anatomy of a Fall which was fine and held my interest but not especially memorable. The last film we saw was Glasshouse, a 2021 arty science fiction film. The IMDB blurb: “Confined to their glasshouse, a family survives The Shred, a toxin that erases memory. Until the sisters are seduced by a Stranger who shatters their peace and stirs a past best left buried.” Like a combination of Picnic at Hanging Rock, The Beguiled and Z for Zechariah. Held my attention and a satisfying ending.
We’ve watched a few Marvel and DC films but probably missed more than we’ve seen. I’ve waited my whole life for comic book films of this calibre and I can’t fault the effects for the most part but the storytelling leaves a lot to be desired. About the only ones I’m actually looking forward to and will likely watch are The Batman Part II and Joker : Folie à deux. Talking about the Joker you missed my little Joker animation on Facebook. Bit of fun. Worth checking out.
Ah! I loved Challengers personally, was a big fan of how maximalist Guadagnino's direction was and found it really gripping and effective.
Anatomy of A Fall is amazing isn't it? Totally agree about the prosecutor, he plays a really convincing pedantic arsehole haha.
Zone Of Interest is incredible but also like Glazer's other work, very deliberate in testing your patience and playing with expectation. It's very powerful but not in the typical way you'd expect of a holocaust film, there's a moment later on that really just took my breath away.
Loved Oppenheimer, honestly the three hours breeze by, perfect Sunday afternoon viewing.
Post a Comment