I consider myself to be a writer.
I didn’t arrive at this consideration quickly or easily and certainly not by way of any great success or breakthrough in writing. I’ve had my moments, I suppose, and I hope to have many more, but they’re not what allows me to (quietly) think of myself as a writer now.
It’s more the state of mind.
I’ve found that I’m happiest when I’m writing and that I’m most content when some good writing has just been done. I berate myself if a day ever passes without my having written something and my unhappiness increases in direct proportion to every additional hour that passes without getting down to it. So, yeah, for better or worse, I can think of myself as a writer now.
I didn’t arrive at this consideration quickly or easily and certainly not by way of any great success or breakthrough in writing. I’ve had my moments, I suppose, and I hope to have many more, but they’re not what allows me to (quietly) think of myself as a writer now.
It’s more the state of mind.
I’ve found that I’m happiest when I’m writing and that I’m most content when some good writing has just been done. I berate myself if a day ever passes without my having written something and my unhappiness increases in direct proportion to every additional hour that passes without getting down to it. So, yeah, for better or worse, I can think of myself as a writer now.
But that’s not what I want to write about at all. That’s just sort of validation, citing why I think I am allowed to say what I want to say.
So… what is it that you want to say, Ken?
It’s not a big deal, really, all I want to say is this:
I have a sort of mistrust of writers who are writers all of the time.
Most writers – the ones I know anyway – are not writers all of the time. They put enormous time and energy into their writing work and they do it brilliantly but then, in downtime, they are just themselves rather than writers.
I realise I’m not making much sense and possibly causing a bit of annoyance too but it’s a tricky one, this, and I’m just trying to get my head around it. You might be saying something like, “he’s wrong, the real writer is a writer every minute of every day, constantly questing for the truth and insight of each and every situation that arises.” Yes, they’re the ones I’m talking about. They’re the ones that worry me a bit.
Don’t get me wrong. The sub-conscious level is always working away, it really is. Some piece of amorphous writing-thought, left alone to ‘stew’ in the back of the mind, can come out so much more sweet-and-tender for the stewing. I’m not talking about that stuff. I’m talking about the writers who go around being writers all the time. I think it’s a confidence thing. If you have the confidence and the faith in yourself, I think you tend to put on the writer’s mantle when you sit down to write and you are just ‘you’ the rest of the time.
That’s why people are often surprised when they meet writers. “I thought he’d be all-flowery,” they might say, “I thought he’d offer some marvellous insight into the Human Condition over tea.” “Instead, all he wanted to do was chat about the Football.”
It’s so natural to not be the writer all of the time. The similarities in other professions are legion. Does the Joiner assess every stool he perches on in the Pub, every bookshelf he scans in the Library? Does the Butcher eye-up every beast in every field he drives past, thinking about how he might carve it up? No. Writers become writers when they are writing and they express themselves in a markedly differently way in the writing than they do in the rest of their lives.
I’m doing it now. You don’t think I talk like this in real-life for Chrissakes?
There are exceptions to everything and sometimes I’m just plain wrong about stuff. Maybe you are an excellent writer and maybe you do spend every minute of your day in the same mode as you do when you are writing. Well done, I don’t mean you. You’re great, you are. Really, great.
I think I’m talking about quite a lot of aspiring writers. I think there’s a misconception that the way you carry yourself, the way you deal with others, the way you promote your efforts, will be the things that will catapult you into some mythical limelight.
Save all that energy, I would say. Save it up and spit it all out onto the page when you are alone with your writing weapon-of-choice.
If I’m totally wrong, that’s okay. We all have to do things our own way and if your way is the way of the constant writer then I wish you well. But even if I’m only partially right, then there’s still a very useful practical application to my notion. Simply put, it is this; you won’t do your best writing by walking around and thinking/talking/making faces about it. It’s when you are closeted in your writing place, faced with the blank paper, the blank screen, that’s when the valuable writing will pour from you.
I just think it’s worth thinking about. If you aspire to be a writer and are working hard at it. Put your writing-juice in the place where it counts, which is directly between you and your computer monitor. Be all-of-your-writer there. Then go out and be yourself at the riverbank and in the woods and at the cinema and in the shop. Because it isn’t being a writer abroad in the world that will make you a good writer. Not in my opinion. It’s down here, quietly, on the page, that the big work gets done.
I probably haven’t said this right at all.
I’m not really a writer this morning.
I have to get to Tesco before it gets busy.
So… what is it that you want to say, Ken?
It’s not a big deal, really, all I want to say is this:
I have a sort of mistrust of writers who are writers all of the time.
Most writers – the ones I know anyway – are not writers all of the time. They put enormous time and energy into their writing work and they do it brilliantly but then, in downtime, they are just themselves rather than writers.
I realise I’m not making much sense and possibly causing a bit of annoyance too but it’s a tricky one, this, and I’m just trying to get my head around it. You might be saying something like, “he’s wrong, the real writer is a writer every minute of every day, constantly questing for the truth and insight of each and every situation that arises.” Yes, they’re the ones I’m talking about. They’re the ones that worry me a bit.
Don’t get me wrong. The sub-conscious level is always working away, it really is. Some piece of amorphous writing-thought, left alone to ‘stew’ in the back of the mind, can come out so much more sweet-and-tender for the stewing. I’m not talking about that stuff. I’m talking about the writers who go around being writers all the time. I think it’s a confidence thing. If you have the confidence and the faith in yourself, I think you tend to put on the writer’s mantle when you sit down to write and you are just ‘you’ the rest of the time.
That’s why people are often surprised when they meet writers. “I thought he’d be all-flowery,” they might say, “I thought he’d offer some marvellous insight into the Human Condition over tea.” “Instead, all he wanted to do was chat about the Football.”
It’s so natural to not be the writer all of the time. The similarities in other professions are legion. Does the Joiner assess every stool he perches on in the Pub, every bookshelf he scans in the Library? Does the Butcher eye-up every beast in every field he drives past, thinking about how he might carve it up? No. Writers become writers when they are writing and they express themselves in a markedly differently way in the writing than they do in the rest of their lives.
I’m doing it now. You don’t think I talk like this in real-life for Chrissakes?
There are exceptions to everything and sometimes I’m just plain wrong about stuff. Maybe you are an excellent writer and maybe you do spend every minute of your day in the same mode as you do when you are writing. Well done, I don’t mean you. You’re great, you are. Really, great.
I think I’m talking about quite a lot of aspiring writers. I think there’s a misconception that the way you carry yourself, the way you deal with others, the way you promote your efforts, will be the things that will catapult you into some mythical limelight.
Save all that energy, I would say. Save it up and spit it all out onto the page when you are alone with your writing weapon-of-choice.
If I’m totally wrong, that’s okay. We all have to do things our own way and if your way is the way of the constant writer then I wish you well. But even if I’m only partially right, then there’s still a very useful practical application to my notion. Simply put, it is this; you won’t do your best writing by walking around and thinking/talking/making faces about it. It’s when you are closeted in your writing place, faced with the blank paper, the blank screen, that’s when the valuable writing will pour from you.
I just think it’s worth thinking about. If you aspire to be a writer and are working hard at it. Put your writing-juice in the place where it counts, which is directly between you and your computer monitor. Be all-of-your-writer there. Then go out and be yourself at the riverbank and in the woods and at the cinema and in the shop. Because it isn’t being a writer abroad in the world that will make you a good writer. Not in my opinion. It’s down here, quietly, on the page, that the big work gets done.
I probably haven’t said this right at all.
I’m not really a writer this morning.
I have to get to Tesco before it gets busy.

13 comments:
I think you nailed it, Ken! I'm one of those people that would say I'm a writer all the time, but mostly it's subconscious stuff. Or I get bored in lectures and turn on the writrr part of my brain to plan a story after inspiration punches me square in the forehead. (Deja vu also does that, but that's a different story.)
When I'm out and about, I like to pretend I can seperate the two parts of my life - the one that makes a writer and the one part that absolutely denies me the right to put words in the correct order. (I like to do that when I'm writing too, but for different reasons.)
But yes, I think we need an off switch so that life doesn't become all about the writing. It's when I'm not writing that I get ideas for other things (that's how I prefer it, anyway; sometimes I get ideas while I'm writing something else entirely!). The off-switch is handy. It means we get to channel the particular Writer Energy when it counts!
Thanks Paul. The vast majority of these blogs are written to myself rather than to anyone else in particular do it's nice when it makes sense to somebody else too. :)
Your blog gave me food for thought. Being single, jobless and skint has made me obsess a little too much about my writing. My 'mind child' or muse is insatiable at the moment. This all or nothing state of mind has dogged me my entire life. I must try and break the cycle.
Hi Simon, I think it's great to be driven and if you're driven 24/7 then that's only admirable.
My point is just that writing energy is best directed towards the writing and nothing else. It seems obvious but much of the energy can be dissipated by trying to be a writer in ways other than writing and that, as far as I am concerned, is quite pointless.
Thanks for coming by. :)
I am also a writer. Yet in reality I write very little. This makes me feel that I may not be a real writer despite the five novels, the hundreds or the poems, the plays, the short stories… When I add it all up it’s hard to ignore the fact that I have been a writer but most of the time I feel like a wroter i.e. a person’s whose writing has all taken place in the past. This is not true because I’m writing now very much in the present but this isn’t real writing. A while ago you insisted I backup my blogs so that they wouldn’t be lost and I did so even going to the bother of installing a program that regularly backs up Blogger not that I have any idea where it backs it up to or how to restore it should Blogger go belly up but I did what you asked. Actually writing—and by that I mean creative writing—is constantly at the fore of my mind but I still struggle to think of myself as a writer, more a wannabe writer: I wanna be writing my next novel just now but I hate just about everything I’ve committed to paper so far. The idea is good and that’s the main thing because the rest will come in its own good time.
Am I a writer (despite my protestations above) all the time though? The answer to that has to be: Yes. But… I am a writer in that I’m receptive to things I might write about all the time. I write about very little—there’s very little to write about that I’ve not already written about and most of the other stuff doesn’t interest me enough—but I keep looking out for new things. Like you, all of that is going on on the inside. I very rarely talk about my writing and my nearest and dearest know better than to ask. I have 3000 words of what I’m hoping will be the next novel sitting on the PC in my office and I keep disappearing ratting away on the keyboard for a couple of minutes and then wandering back in the living room and I’ve never said a word to Carrie about it. It’s no big secret. She may very well read this comment and then she’ll know but I’m not keeping it from her for any other reason that what is there to say? I’ve said it. I’ve written 3000 words and I pretty much hate every single one of them and all I’m looking for is an excuse to jack it all in and go and read a few more comics.
I like to think that I’m not a pretentious kind of person which is why I shy away from referring to myself as ‘a novelist’ because that just sounds so pretentious to me. I’m a bloke who writes books that nobody (rounding the figures down) reads. What have I to be pretentious about? Am I proud of what I’ve written? On one level, yes, but I was always taught that pride was a bad thing most of the time and so I hedge my bets and say that I’m not embarrassed by what I’ve written. I like it that people like you think of me as Jimmy-the-writer and that’s how most people online will think of me and I like to think that that’s the real me but I think I’ve become so used to hiding that side of me in the real world (because no one was ever interested or wanted to understand what I was all about) that I still tend to write on the sly as it were.
Writing isn’t all about writing. I’ve said this before. Writing is like weight training: you eat well, give you food time to digest, rest and repeat. And writing is just like that: you take in good ideas, meditate on them and then write about them. Some of us have a longer gestation period than others. I take a very long time to process my ideas. I ruminate constantly. It’s all part of the writing process. And it really doesn’t need to be shared. I know some people (especially old people) love to talk about how their alimentary canal works and that’s fine but if I’ve just written a pile of shit why would I want to share that with anyone?
This is one of the things that upsets me about being online because too many people are willing to share what they’re doing and they put pressure on the rest of us to share. (How many words did you write today?) I personally wish they’d just get on with the job in hand and let us know when we can buy the damn book when it’s done.
Jim: You're very honest. I think I've learned a bit of that off you down the past (good) few years and, like in your books, the things you say often make me think you have direct access to the inside of my head. This is true of here.
I, too, don't write nearly as much as I want to and this grates and wears on me more and more as time passes. More and more, I begrudge the time I have to do other things and, these days, when even those other things are of such low value to anyone, it increases the will to commit more to the writing.
I'm glad about the blog, I think it's a very valuable collection of writings and it would be a crying shame if it was lost for the sake of some electrical spark or corporate takeover.
You are, as you say, Jimmy The Writer and, becuase we inject at least as much truth into these online-endeavours of ours as we do into our material lives then that, as much as anything else, is the Truth.
I'm not nearly as prolific as you and yet, I'd list me in the same classification.
I write because it's like breathing: I do it virtually without thinking about it. I don't think about it 24/7 because the "real world" intrudes. :) But if that voice in my head, which doesn't need medication, keeps repeating the same sentence over and over, it's time to sit and let the rest of the thoughts flow from behind it.
I'm glad you share...cause then we know we're not alone. ;)
Dear Hope, If I'm in the same classification as you, then I know things are not too bad. Thanks, as ever, for stopping by. :)
Very interesting food for thought! For me, life seems to get in the way of the idea of being a writer all the time. I think you're spot on-give everything to whatever it is you're doing and writing can only be a part of that.
ND: Thanks. I constantly fight to make time for my writing. I win, I have to, but it's easy to see how people don't make time to actually write and then try to be writers in the more 'talky' ways. :)
I think you are right. I do my best writing when I am cutting the grass.....always 'on' but really living two very separate lives. The normal life of Mum and muck cleaner and the life of 'thank god they are gone to school' Writer. Close the door and all that has been gathered and stewed comes spilling out on to the page. Nice way to wrap up a Sunday evening here n your blog Ken.
Am I writer all the time? Not hardly. It comes third, for me, usually, after music and visual art, on my list of creative work that is important to me. At core I'm a composer. I also write poems, and song lyrics, and I'm pretty good at those.
But I share your distrust. I've gotten into many, many arguments and disputes with the "all writer, all the time" types. I've had poets who are Poets all the time tell me to my face that they can't understand why my poems are as good as theirs, when I don't revise them as many times as they do, and I also don't write a poem every day. I've gotten into real trouble with Poets who really want to object to my poems, but can only do so on moral grounds, not on literary ones.
In fact, I never write anything till I feel like it. My practice is not to write every day, but to be ready to write when a poem wants to come forward. I listen for them to speak to me, I don't go seeking them out.
Jim and I have talked a few times about how a writer is someone whose first response to life and life's experiences, is to write about it, to write about them. By which definition, Jim is a writer, and I'm not. It IS my response, to write about life, but again, a distant third after music and visual art.
I just posted something on my blog about how I'm discovering that, for now anyway, writing is something I do in the morning, with other arts taking up the rest of the day.
So I have no idea if I'm a writer. I do write. Sometimes.
My Uncle (who was a serious musician) told me no one could be a writer until they were over 40. I think he meant the type of writer who discuss the human condition over tea.
I mistrust people who tell you they are a writer or musician or whatever and then have to do something to prove it to you. That's where the difference seems to be, to me.
Post a Comment