****** Major ‘Sherlock’ Spoilers ahead, so tread carefully… ******
I greatly enjoyed the final episode of series 2 of ‘Sherlock last Sunday night. I also enjoy that the writers gleefully left us with a little conundrum. How did Sherlock apparently jump to his death and not die, despite Watson witnessing the entire event?
I greatly enjoyed the final episode of series 2 of ‘Sherlock last Sunday night. I also enjoy that the writers gleefully left us with a little conundrum. How did Sherlock apparently jump to his death and not die, despite Watson witnessing the entire event?
Lots of you have theorised and, with an hour to waste, I thought I would theorise myself, with the help of a YouTube extract which shows the jump sequence, albeit shown in mirror-image for some unknown reason.
What I’d like to do is tell you how I think it’s done, then take you to particular moments in that YouTube clip where the makers seem to have left sufficient information for to confirm this. Then, finally, as a writer, I want to suggest one finesse that might not turn up in episode 1 of series 3 but I think I would use it, if I could.
Here we go.
Sherlock does jump off the roof but the main clue to how he does it comes at 2.58 in that clip when he says “it’s a trick, it’s just a magic trick” cos, guys, that’s exactly what it is.
One of the keys to a magic trick is to have the audience positioned exactly where you need them so that the illusion works. It’s all about the positioning here. Sherlock positions Watson at 1.18 in the clip, “Turn around and walk back where you came from” Watson obliges and at 1.27 is told to ‘Stop There’ because now he is in position.
Only now does Sherlock tell Watson that he is, indeed, up on the roof.
Here’s the thing…
There is now a low level building between Sherlock and Watson. Check 1.37 or 2.28 if you don’t believe me. Watson can see Sherlock but, critically, he cannot see the ground beneath him. At 3.04 we see Watson’s point of view on this. He starts to walk forward again but Sherlock tells him to, “stay exactly where you are.”
With the positioning arranged, the rest is easy-peasy.
There is a truck in the street beneath Sherlock. We see it quite clearly at 4.07, just after the jump as Watson comes around the corner of the lower building, just before the bike hits him. It was great that the filmmakers left us this shot, so we could work it out. We see the truck drive off at 4.15.
The crunch on the street at 3.57, with nobody else in view, may prove to be the most disingenuous shot in the sequence. The speed at which Watson runs forward and glimpses the body in the street (again 4.07) suggests that Sherlock stays in the truck and drives away. The body in the street is then somebody else, not Moriarity, I think. He is placed there by the team of medical people/actors which have been pre-arranged to place the body once Watson is in position and cannot see.
Disorientated by the bike crash, Watson runs in, pushes through checks the body’s pulse and sees that it is dead. We don’t really see Sherlock’s face clearly here. The assistants remove the corpse on a stretcher and viola, the deed is done.
That’s my theory. It may not be right but I think it works well.
Now.
I would add one other finesse, if it were me writing it. Perhaps they have. Doesn’t Watson seem more ‘slurry’ than he would be, even with the bicycle crash and the grief and the shock? I would have it that he was administered with a good dose of the same drug that was used in the previous Baskerville episode. The one that heightened suggestibility. Perhaps is was administered by the cyclist or perhaps much earlier. That, above all else, may be why Sherlock needed, out of character, to ask for some help this time around.
Nerdy, I know, but I had fun doing this.

21 comments:
Very cool! I like it. You mention the pre-arranged medical people... Yes, don't forget he went to Molly and said he wasn't okay and did need her help! And she was noteably absent from the final bit and not one of the people with a gun trained on them. That's the bit I keep remembering... Sherlock going to Molly. And ALSO that the little kid screamed when she saw Sherlock, so there's possibly someone or something out that that looks like Sherlock...
I might have missed some details as I've only watched it that one time though, I keep meaning to re-watch it to see if I'm remembering it correctly.
Nice one, Ken!
MTP (Jack)
P.S. I hadn't got round to (at least trying to) work/ing out exactly how the roof sequence might have happened (had a few fleeting ideas) ... Looks like you might have saved me the effort!
With your brains and your beauty... ;-)
It's a nice theory, but Moffat will obviously do something completely different.
Which is nice! Can't wait for season three.
Thanks Jack, glad you liked it. :)
Hi Laurel, I'm feeling cocky about this, I don't reckon his solution will be very much different to this one. :) Let's meet up here after S3-E1 and compare notes. :)
Hello sir! It's fun, theorising on this cliffhanger, hmm? And your theory does seem very likely. One thing I'm confused about, though, is this: why is it so important for Watson alone to believe Sherlock's dead? How can Sherlock be sure that the other assassins aren't watching, from completely different angles?
I have a theory about how Watson gets dosed with the hallucinogenic substance. There's that scene where he arrives back at the flat and opens that envelope full of sand...
Hi Jason thanks for having a look. I felt a little bad, at first, doing this, but I think it's a game which the writers like us to play and I love the way they've left some genuine clues in the sequence for us to play with. That last episode was close to perfection, as far as I was concerned.
I take your point. I think some small stretches had to be made to necessitate Sherlock doing what he did. The assassins were seen to all be in place, ready to do the deed(s) I guess Sherlock was relying on them being otherwise occupied at the time. Beyond that, convince Dr Watson and you convince the world was perhaps the thinking.
I am confused by Sherlock's rather grief-stricken 'grab head' gesture after M dies on the roof. Was he doing something to himself to ease the fall into the cushioned truck? Hmmm and double-hmmm... :)
Ah yes, of course, the hitmen were poised!
Fantastic deduction. More or less what I came up with, positioning Watson, falling into the truck, etc.
I heard one other theory (from @CaroWallis). Instead of positioning a body next to the truck, Sherlock simply jumped out and pretended to be dead. Possibly Molly helped him to appear dead...
Do you think Moriarty is really dead? Maybe he faked shooting himself...
Jason: Delighted you came by, J, after all, you *do* have something of an inside track. :)
John: I don't think M is dead, he's waaaay too much fun. :)
Very good, and I agree with all of your deductions.
Just a couple of little things which may or may not have any relevance:
1. The episode was called The Reichenbach Fall (i.e. singular, as opposed to the original Conan Doyle version which was plural in reference to the series of Swiss waterfalls) and, as we were told, the English version of Reichenbach is Richard Brook, i.e. Moriarty's alias. I didn't believe that it was Moriarty's (dead or alive) body that was used for the fall but I wondered if it had any relevance?
2. When Mycroft was telling Watson about a number of assassins who had moved into Baker Street, he showed images and one of which was a female assassin who was referred to by name. This seems trivial but she never appeared, either during the episode and was killed like the others, or in the closing scenes when Moriarty explained that assassins were covering Sherlock's loved ones.
I should really watch the episode again, although I fear I will find even more whys/whats to ponder over!
@MazzyK
I wonder what it says about me that I never gave the matter a seconds thought.
Love this idea of Sherlock landing in the truck, then tumbling to the pavement to play dead. Less of a (literal) leap of faith than the hallucinogenic angle.
Maria: Interesting observations. I hadn't spotted the assassin lady reference. In truth, I didn't spot much, I just enjoyed the ride. I went back to that jump scene to cement my theories.
Jim: You are, as my Mum used to say, a Law Unto Yourself. :)
Jason: It's a great idea but I don't think there's time before Watson runs forward and sees the body prior to the bike-strike. :) Plus the body is never clearly shown to be Holmes, although there is a much-used publicity-still which clearly does.
Very cool Ken.Good work- worthy of Mr Holmes himself ....xxx
Elementary, my dear Serena :)
Rather than being a spoiler, this has enhanced my anticipation of the next series. Well done Ken.
Stef: Thanks. I'm very pleased to hear that. I hear we will see more before the end of the year, which is exciting.
Brilliant deduction ! (wonder where the viola comes in ? :0) voilà
Hi Ken the family have given your post full consideration and we agree with the druggie vibe and the positioning of 'John' . I agree about the low roof - but the rest of the family disagree. How fantastic was Martin Freeman? Top notch in my book. It's been a great series. Anyway we loved your take on it. Can't wait until we know for sure. MC x
Hi MC How great to see your comment here. Regards to your clever family. As I was saying only today, Martin Freeman was *brilliant*, he grounds all the excesses of the show with his emotional honesty.
Thanks for considering my theory. :)
It's clear that the body which hit the ground is not Sherlock. When he jumps (and in the air), his body is perpendicular to the pavement. So, if Sherlock drops to the ground, his body should be in the same axe. The body which hit the ground is parallel to the pavement...
Post a Comment